-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 182
feat: Unit Add sidebar [FC-0114] #2837
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: Unit Add sidebar [FC-0114] #2837
Conversation
|
Thanks for the pull request, @ChrisChV! This repository is currently maintained by Once you've gone through the following steps feel free to tag them in a comment and let them know that your changes are ready for engineering review. 🔘 Get product approvalIf you haven't already, check this list to see if your contribution needs to go through the product review process.
🔘 Provide contextTo help your reviewers and other members of the community understand the purpose and larger context of your changes, feel free to add as much of the following information to the PR description as you can:
🔘 Get a green buildIf one or more checks are failing, continue working on your changes until this is no longer the case and your build turns green. DetailsWhere can I find more information?If you'd like to get more details on all aspects of the review process for open source pull requests (OSPRs), check out the following resources: When can I expect my changes to be merged?Our goal is to get community contributions seen and reviewed as efficiently as possible. However, the amount of time that it takes to review and merge a PR can vary significantly based on factors such as:
💡 As a result it may take up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2837 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 95.21% 95.22%
========================================
Files 1326 1328 +2
Lines 30343 30510 +167
Branches 6638 6884 +246
========================================
+ Hits 28892 29053 +161
- Misses 1394 1400 +6
Partials 57 57 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
- Existing tab implemented using the ComponentPicker - Basic component implemented in the new tab
b33cb44 to
c944174
Compare
navinkarkera
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisChV Overall it looks good.
The add sidebar even works in library sourced units, we should probably disable/hide add button and also have a check in add sidebar to disallow adding components.
| <MultiLibraryProvider> | ||
| <ComponentPicker | ||
| showOnlyPublished | ||
| extraFilter={['NOT block_type = "unit"', 'NOT block_type = "section"', 'NOT block_type = "subsection"']} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisChV We need to come up with better filter here, it is displaying units, subsections, sections and other components from courses including course blocks.
| extraFilter={['NOT block_type = "unit"', 'NOT block_type = "section"', 'NOT block_type = "subsection"']} | |
| extraFilter={['type = "library_block"']} |
Above change works but we need to test it a bit more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated: c16ff58
navinkarkera
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ChrisChV Looks good.
bradenmacdonald
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM! Please just make the component colors more DRY by refactoring them to use CSS variables (not SCSS variables) and this is good to go as far as I'm concerned.
|
Thanks for those changes! ✅ |
Description
Supporting information
Testing instructions
Addbutton in the new header. Verify that the add sidebar is open.Add Existingtag.Other information
N/A
Best Practices Checklist
We're trying to move away from some deprecated patterns in this codebase. Please
check if your PR meets these recommendations before asking for a review:
.ts,.tsx).propTypesanddefaultPropsin any new or modified code.src/testUtils.tsx(specificallyinitializeMocks)apiHooks.tsin this repo for examples.messages.tsfiles have adescriptionfor translators to use.../in import paths. To import from parent folders, use@src, e.g.import { initializeMocks } from '@src/testUtils';instead offrom '../../../../testUtils'